<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joel gives bad advice: details at 11:00</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notcharles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/joel-gives-bad-advice-details-at-1100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notcharles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/joel-gives-bad-advice-details-at-1100/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://notcharles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/joel-gives-bad-advice-details-at-1100/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notcharles.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to imply that the message Joel talks about is a popup.  But what else would the menu item do if you click on it and the associated action can&#039;t be performed?  Accept your click but do nothing?  That&#039;s even worse!  With a Firefox-style notification bar, you risk the user not noticing it just opened (I often click on links and find that apparently nothing happened, and it takes me several clicks before I notice that it&#039;s opened the &quot;blocked popup&quot; notification.)

I was picturing a still-active menu item with a short tag next to it (&quot;DISABLED: No selection&quot; or something), which pops open a more complete explanation if you ignore the tag and try to select it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that the message Joel talks about is a popup.  But what else would the menu item do if you click on it and the associated action can&#8217;t be performed?  Accept your click but do nothing?  That&#8217;s even worse!  With a Firefox-style notification bar, you risk the user not noticing it just opened (I often click on links and find that apparently nothing happened, and it takes me several clicks before I notice that it&#8217;s opened the &#8220;blocked popup&#8221; notification.)</p>
<p>I was picturing a still-active menu item with a short tag next to it (&#8221;DISABLED: No selection&#8221; or something), which pops open a more complete explanation if you ignore the tag and try to select it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McCurdy</title>
		<link>http://notcharles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/joel-gives-bad-advice-details-at-1100/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McCurdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notcharles.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he&#039;s ever had comments on his blog as such; there&#039;s a Fog Creek discussion board around somewhere though, which probably has threads about his articles.

As for my take, I think it&#039;s an indictment of most of the last 25 years of UI design that when we hear &quot;the menu item can display a message&quot;, we think of modal dialog boxes.  If Joel&#039;s plan used a Firefox-style notification bar, then it wouldn&#039;t be so massively irritating.  That said, I don&#039;t know whether it&#039;d actually be annoying or not, and I&#039;m not really the best person to judge either - for starters, I hardly ever use menu bars, and when I do, nothing much seems to be disabled anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s ever had comments on his blog as such; there&#8217;s a Fog Creek discussion board around somewhere though, which probably has threads about his articles.</p>
<p>As for my take, I think it&#8217;s an indictment of most of the last 25 years of UI design that when we hear &#8220;the menu item can display a message&#8221;, we think of modal dialog boxes.  If Joel&#8217;s plan used a Firefox-style notification bar, then it wouldn&#8217;t be so massively irritating.  That said, I don&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;d actually be annoying or not, and I&#8217;m not really the best person to judge either &#8211; for starters, I hardly ever use menu bars, and when I do, nothing much seems to be disabled anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stirling Westrup</title>
		<link>http://notcharles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/joel-gives-bad-advice-details-at-1100/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Stirling Westrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 03:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notcharles.wordpress.com/?p=23#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I have long advocated this. In the one WIMP interface I ever built from scratch (for a video game), disabled menu items were greyed out and clicking on them did nothing, but hovering the mouse over one would tell you why it was greyed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long advocated this. In the one WIMP interface I ever built from scratch (for a video game), disabled menu items were greyed out and clicking on them did nothing, but hovering the mouse over one would tell you why it was greyed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
